Forums Search

Dodgy jaguar Sign??

Last Post 05 Jun 2010 09:58 AM by Jimbo. 6 Replies.

Sort:

	Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.

Author

Messages

Advertising Antiques Ltd User is Offline

Guru Tat

Posts:4949

31 Mar 2010 08:24 PM
Anyone else think that this is wrong? Look how far the screw holes are in towards the centre of the sign, how thin and white the enamel is, how thin the enamel looks around the screw holes and a black back with rows of dots on? The badge and writing looks off too? cgi.ebay.co.uk/Large-old-porcelain-...ltDomain_0

Griffon65

Tat Addict

Posts:638

01 Apr 2010 07:17 PM
Yep I totally agree, it’s a copy. All the indications are there, the screw holes to far in. The back is to way to clean and shinny, no messy over spill of enamel. The uniform firing marks are also a good give away that it’s a copy.

markbigears User is Offline

Mad Keen Collector

Posts:412

fleece77

Guru Tat

Posts:2120

27 Apr 2010 10:39 AM
There was another one that just went through the Ebay Australia site,that made AU$1400+ and I'm sure it was dodge too. Gordo

Jimbo

Mad Keen Collector

Posts:331

04 Jun 2010 10:23 PM
Does this Colman's one look a bit dodgy too on ebay? Colours look wrong and there should be a code on the botom right. http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI....K:MEWAX:IT

Griffon65

Tat Addict

Posts:638

05 Jun 2010 08:01 AM
Morning Jimbo, ITS WRONG!! Steer well clear; it’s a 1970s/80s copy.

Jimbo

Mad Keen Collector

Posts:331

05 Jun 2010 09:58 AM
Thought so, it went for £40 too. Thanks Griff

You are not authorized to post a reply.

Active Forums 4.2

NOT LICENSED FOR PRODUCTION USE
www.activemodules.com

LOGIN