Authentic or reproduction??
Last Post 08 Sep 2012 01:30 PM by hoarder. 17 Replies.
Printer Friendly
Sort:
PrevPrev NextNext
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>
Author Messages
enamelsigns72User is Offline
Tatter
Tatter
Send Private Message
Posts:59
enamelsigns72

--
07 Sep 2012 07:52 AM  

Hello everyone, i would really appreciate some advice on this Stephens Ink sign that is coming up for auction tomorrow.  It is a sign that was purchased in India by the seller, and I was just wondering whether anyone has seen this example before, and whether you think it is original or a very good reproduction? It measures approximately 400 mm x 300 mm.  Your advice will be appreciated.

 

 

JimboUser is Offline
Mad Keen Collector
Mad Keen Collector
Send Private Message
Posts:331
Jimbo

--
07 Sep 2012 08:09 AM  
It's the corners that bother me - all 'damaged' in the same way and no marks on the front of the sign
LummoxUser is Offline
The Tatfather
The Tatfather
Send Private Message
Posts:5226
Lummox

--
07 Sep 2012 08:48 AM  

A very well known dealer ( although ) not particulary in signs offered me one of these a while back. He had sourced 2 from India both almost mint. When I handled it it just ' felt ' wrong despite the detail being good and the back not being the usual uniform colour. Also it was too bendy ?

Since I have now seen about 8 others this year all mostly confimed from India I certainly would avoid. I believe they have old factories still in use in India which produce signs very much in the " Old Way " I reckon these may be coming from the same source that is now making " extremely good " Motoring sign copies to order, who have caught out many an established collector they are that good ( BAD )

Mind you it seems you already have doubts yourself otherwise you would not have posted, so take your own suspisions on board and leave well alone !!

Lummox

SteveTheTykeUser is Offline
Guru Tat
Guru Tat
Send Private Message
Posts:1522
SteveTheTyke

--
07 Sep 2012 09:23 AM  

I've had one of these Stephen's Signs in the past. Originals are a lot, lot sharper on the bottle images, and on the lettering. I'd avoid the one shown like the plague, even though the back looks convincing.

hoarderUser is Offline
Mad Keen Collector
Mad Keen Collector
Send Private Message
Posts:146
hoarder

--
07 Sep 2012 01:45 PM  
http://www.ebay.com/itm/ws/eBayISAP...TQ:US:1123
This has started alarm bells as I have just bought one of these Thackers from India, not the same dealer as the link above but he offered me the same sign for the same price, then i also found this dealer selling the above. looks like ive been had.
JimboUser is Offline
Mad Keen Collector
Mad Keen Collector
Send Private Message
Posts:331
Jimbo

--
07 Sep 2012 03:42 PM  
This bothered me too while we were are on the subject:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Old-Ename...1e7202790c

Compare it to Al's:

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI....true&rt=nc

But maybe I'm getting paranoid!
GritblasterUser is Offline
Tatter
Tatter
Send Private Message
Posts:13
Gritblaster

--
07 Sep 2012 04:36 PM  

I've another to ask about please gentlemen. Not come across this one before - genuine do you think ?  Item No. 320976828052

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/320976828...578wt_1397

 

Thanks !

SteveTheTykeUser is Offline
Guru Tat
Guru Tat
Send Private Message
Posts:1522
SteveTheTyke

--
07 Sep 2012 04:58 PM  

I had my doubts about this one too. On the side of the can on the main picture the wording doesn't sit right with the angle of the can, and the price seems to creep around the corner onto the main face. Surely the quality of the setting out of the script and details at the time (1930s?) would have been a lot better? Also the hanging holes don't seem to be set to hang the can horizontal. Is it another dodgy Shell can version?

GritblasterUser is Offline
Tatter
Tatter
Send Private Message
Posts:13
Gritblaster

--
07 Sep 2012 05:52 PM  

 Thanks for your opinion Steve, think I'll give this one a miss - not worth the risk. Got a feeling that it might go for big bucks though ...

sign-seekerUser is Offline
Tat Addict
Tat Addict
Send Private Message
Posts:900
sign-seeker

--
07 Sep 2012 06:07 PM  

I first saw one of these probably fifteen years ago, and had it down just as late production, and maybe non-British. I'm more hesitant to write them off as 'repro' than others. I would agree though that they are quite crude and lacking in quality, but I am not yet convinced either way! Sorry to sit on the fence on this one!

enamelsigns72User is Offline
Tatter
Tatter
Send Private Message
Posts:59
enamelsigns72

--
07 Sep 2012 06:21 PM  
Thank you for all the advice. I agree with the views posted. I have my doubts on this one!
sign-seekerUser is Offline
Tat Addict
Tat Addict
Send Private Message
Posts:900
sign-seeker

--
07 Sep 2012 07:00 PM  

The Bullards comes in two different versions, with colour variations, and I believe both those that the links are to are good. Please don't start a panic about them!!!

I have also seen the Thackers around for years and would be pretty confident that was OK too.

But, I'm glad someone has pointed out the 'Mibiloil' double-sided can though! I have seen an exceptionally good quality, heavy repro of one of those, but whether this one is right I'm unsure. I'd like to handle it myself!

banjo boyUser is Offline
The Tatfather
The Tatfather
Send Private Message
Posts:6121
banjo boy

--
07 Sep 2012 08:18 PM  

That Mobiloil and Thackers are Shit...

JimboUser is Offline
Mad Keen Collector
Mad Keen Collector
Send Private Message
Posts:331
Jimbo

--
07 Sep 2012 08:19 PM  

But, I'm glad someone has pointed out the 'Mibiloil' double-sided can though! I have seen an exceptionally good quality, heavy repro of one of those, but whether this one is right I'm unsure. I'd like to handle it myself!


When I first looked at the Mobiloil sign i thought that it was strange that there were so many similar photos and yet none of the back
banjo boyUser is Offline
The Tatfather
The Tatfather
Send Private Message
Posts:6121
banjo boy

--
07 Sep 2012 08:21 PM  

That Stephens ink sign is shit  too..

You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 1 of 212 > >>


Active Forums 4.2
NOT LICENSED FOR PRODUCTION USE
www.activemodules.com